Ill-Defined Problem Solving Does Not Benefit From Daytime Napping
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Spotlight on daytime napping during early childhood
Daytime napping undergoes a remarkable change in early childhood, and research regarding its relationship to cognitive development has recently accelerated. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of this relationship focusing on children aged <5 years. First, we evaluate different studies on the basis of the experimental design used and the specific cognitive processes they inve...
متن کاملWho does (not) benefit from entrepreneurship programs?
Funding information Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; SSHRC Research Summary: We evaluate a technology entrepreneurship training program by comparing career decisions among applicants accepted into the program with unaccepted applicants who are program finalists. We fin...
متن کاملInsomnia and daytime napping in older adults.
Insomnia, daytime sleepiness, and napping are all highly prevalent among the elderly, reflecting changes in sleep architecture, sleep efficiency, sleep quality, and circadian sleep-wake cycles. Insomnia is sometimes associated with subjective daytime sleepiness, as well as other clinical and socioeconomic consequences. The daytime sleepiness will at times lead to napping. Although napping is vi...
متن کاملDiagrams benefit symbolic problem solving
BACKGROUND The format of a mathematics problem often influences students' problem-solving performance. For example, providing diagrams in conjunction with story problems can benefit students' understanding, choice of strategy, and accuracy on story problems. However, it remains unclear whether providing diagrams in conjunction with symbolic equations can benefit problem-solving performance as w...
متن کاملCritically ill children did not benefit from tight glycaemic control.
Study queStion Setting: Thirty-five paediatric intensive care unit (ICU) centres. Patients: Three hundred and sixty patients (median age 5.5 years, IQR 1.4–12.5 years) in the lower target group; 353 patients (median age 6.7 years, IQR 1.7–12.8 years) in the higher target group. Intervention: Randomisation to low target glycaemic control group (80–110 mg/dL (3.3–6.1 mmol/L)) or higher target gly...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Psychology
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00559